Difference between revisions of "Talk:Subaru Okiya"
From Detective Conan Wiki
(looking for critique about a proposed Okiya is Akai article) |
(→Comments on proposed Okiya is Akai page: my thoughts) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Comments on proposed Okiya is Akai page == | == Comments on proposed Okiya is Akai page == | ||
[[User:Chekhov MacGuffin/Okiya identity|I have sandboxed a list of arguments about Okiya and Akai being the same person here]]. I am looking for critique and whether it is acceptable to move it pages of this type to the article mainspace. [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|Chekhov MacGuffin]] 03:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin/Okiya identity|I have sandboxed a list of arguments about Okiya and Akai being the same person here]]. I am looking for critique and whether it is acceptable to move it pages of this type to the article mainspace. [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|Chekhov MacGuffin]] 03:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :My thoughts, as follows: | ||
| + | * The "Okiya and Akai are both left handed" could look nicer, possibly in a bullet-format? | ||
| + | * The first mention of the characters should be wikilinked. | ||
| + | * In general, some of the personal speculation (IE. "This is a terrible excuse; Conan cannot be serious) sounds very un-encyclopedic. "Some believe that this is a terrible excuse, and that Conan cannot possibly be serious." is a better fit. On Wikipedia, they would argue that "some" is very "weasel word-ish", but we are not Wikipedia, so no problems with that here. | ||
| + | * The Gundam points are very interesting. Never thought about that. | ||
| + | IMO, it looks perfectly fine. What I'm wondering is how you're gonna put it into the article. You want it as its own article? That could work, but in the style that Wikipedia does it (In that its linked in Okiya's article, and a small summary of that page is on Okiya's actual page, as well,) IMO. [[User:CarpetCrawler|<span style="color:#660066">'''''Carpet'''''</span><span style="color:#000033">'''''Crawler'''''</span>]][[User_talk:CarpetCrawler|<span style="color:#990033"><sup>'''''message me'''''</sup></span>]] 18:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 19 December 2010
Akai Theory
So, is the rest of the theory that Scar Akai is the real Bourbon? Otherwise it makes no sense. NakagawaRyou 07:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's what the theory is getting at. CarpetCrawlermessage me 17:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments on proposed Okiya is Akai page
I have sandboxed a list of arguments about Okiya and Akai being the same person here. I am looking for critique and whether it is acceptable to move it pages of this type to the article mainspace. Chekhov MacGuffin 03:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- My thoughts, as follows:
- The "Okiya and Akai are both left handed" could look nicer, possibly in a bullet-format?
- The first mention of the characters should be wikilinked.
- In general, some of the personal speculation (IE. "This is a terrible excuse; Conan cannot be serious) sounds very un-encyclopedic. "Some believe that this is a terrible excuse, and that Conan cannot possibly be serious." is a better fit. On Wikipedia, they would argue that "some" is very "weasel word-ish", but we are not Wikipedia, so no problems with that here.
- The Gundam points are very interesting. Never thought about that.
IMO, it looks perfectly fine. What I'm wondering is how you're gonna put it into the article. You want it as its own article? That could work, but in the style that Wikipedia does it (In that its linked in Okiya's article, and a small summary of that page is on Okiya's actual page, as well,) IMO. CarpetCrawlermessage me 18:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
