|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Suicidal Vermouth==
| + | {{db-userreq}} |
| − | About Vermouth's suicidal things, I put the citation needed there as a request for quotes or actions of hers that indicated suicidal intent. I was hoping you could find some for the references. In the mean time, I put it back with an invisible note pending quotes/examples in the reference. The reason I am bothering is I can think of a few lines of hers that are depressing, like "My life has represents a series of misfortunes" and "no angel has ever smiled upon me", but I cannot think of any that indicate desire for self harm, so I am questioning validity of the statement that she has shown suicidal intent. Depressing for sure though. [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#B22222">Chekhov</font> <font color="#2F4F4F">MacGuffin</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#696969">talk</font>''']]</sup> 04:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| − | The inclination is "almost suicidal," as in these lines themselves are a matter of perspective; they can be read that way, but they can also be read as something different. Which way is a matter of perspective and, given the more depressing thoughts, there's plenty of merit to the idea of suicidal as is the idea of a different freedom. That's why I left it listed as "almost suicidal" as opposed to outright "suicidal" and removed the sitation; I can quote a thousand different depressing lines from Vermouth and the perspective of suicidal can be argued in almost all of them. The validity would vary, but the possibility is real, be it in Vermouth or anyone in such a state. Example, I can argue Vermouth cheering on Conan's attempt to take down the Organization as suicidal; treason is punished with murder in the Organization. However, that can just as easily be read as a desire for freedom. The bigger inclination is she always kills her characters off. Sharon Vineyard I can understand, since she was popular enough to require such a problem, but even the serial killer to draw out and kill Shuichi. People disappear, some of whom want to disappear, it's sad but true (and for in canon examples we have Numabuchi and the number of almost suicides disguised as murders). And running with the assumption concerning her, apparently, nobody parents, that would be three deaths that really didn't have to happen (although they also pivot on the idea they were all simply characters and not people like the Araides). It's cleaner for her past with murder, but not necessary. Further, deaths leave evidence no matter what you do, some disappearences don't; it's seems smarter and more Organization like to not kill a fictional character under such free circumstances. While this is all speculation, this is reason to believe Vermouth has a fascination with killing her characters, killing pieces of herself. If you can submit this in some cleaner way, or would rather argue it, I welcome you to it either way.
| + | If you're not going to read my posts and ignore details, like the fact that an additional adjective is necessary, completely ignore the presented reasoning, and cast your unsubstantiated reasoning as a fact, then I'm just going to allow the talk page to stand like this and eradicate all speculations from the site. If you undo that, then congratulations, you've made me not able to trust a word this wiki has to say and is my sign to cut out. |
| | + | |
| | + | It's here. Fuck off, shit bags (yes, this is an attempt to draw attention and get the whole page deleted). |
| | + | |
| | + | == Just for that == |
| | + | |
| | + | This account isn't getting deleted. <3 'Tis a shame if you really want to go, I did like your contributions, and did understand your side. A wiki isn't one big happy family, and there will be disagreements amongst other members here. Discussing them civilly is always the best option. Whining and cursing everyone out on your talk page and user page most certainly isn't. If you do decide to leave, that is quite unfortunate, but it is your prerogative. [[User:CarpetCrawler|<span style="color:#660066">'''''Carpet'''''</span><span style="color:#000033">'''''Crawler'''''</span>]][[User_talk:CarpetCrawler|<span style="color:#990033"><sup>'''''message me'''''</sup></span>]] 05:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:24, 19 May 2011
Template:Db-userreq
If you're not going to read my posts and ignore details, like the fact that an additional adjective is necessary, completely ignore the presented reasoning, and cast your unsubstantiated reasoning as a fact, then I'm just going to allow the talk page to stand like this and eradicate all speculations from the site. If you undo that, then congratulations, you've made me not able to trust a word this wiki has to say and is my sign to cut out.
It's here. Fuck off, shit bags (yes, this is an attempt to draw attention and get the whole page deleted).
Just for that
This account isn't getting deleted. <3 'Tis a shame if you really want to go, I did like your contributions, and did understand your side. A wiki isn't one big happy family, and there will be disagreements amongst other members here. Discussing them civilly is always the best option. Whining and cursing everyone out on your talk page and user page most certainly isn't. If you do decide to leave, that is quite unfortunate, but it is your prerogative. CarpetCrawlermessage me 05:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
