Difference between revisions of "User talk:Arrimasarrington1992"
(I am assuming the 1992 means that the user is 24. That is sad.) |
(→Forgiving: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
You'll probably be permanently banned on the forum AND wiki if you go back to your old behavior when your ban expires. In the meantime, you should think about how you can improve your interactions with people. I know you know how wikis work because I can see [[Special:Contributions/Arringtastic1992|your]] [[Special:Contributions/Arrimasarrington1992|edit]] [[Special:Contributions/Arrimas Arrington|history]]. You posted on my userpage to ask JimmyKudoTV a question in order to draw my attention. It is gross that you are so desperate for attention and validation that you are willing to cause trouble to get it. You should know better than to waste your time with that because I'll simply ban you, delete your posts, and it will be like you never made an account on the site in the first place, and no one will remember you existed. I hope you find a more constructive and amicable way to post when your ban expires. [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#B22222">Chekhov</font> <font color="#2F4F4F">MacGuffin</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#696969">talk</font>''']]</sup> 20:08, 28 August 2016 (CEST) | You'll probably be permanently banned on the forum AND wiki if you go back to your old behavior when your ban expires. In the meantime, you should think about how you can improve your interactions with people. I know you know how wikis work because I can see [[Special:Contributions/Arringtastic1992|your]] [[Special:Contributions/Arrimasarrington1992|edit]] [[Special:Contributions/Arrimas Arrington|history]]. You posted on my userpage to ask JimmyKudoTV a question in order to draw my attention. It is gross that you are so desperate for attention and validation that you are willing to cause trouble to get it. You should know better than to waste your time with that because I'll simply ban you, delete your posts, and it will be like you never made an account on the site in the first place, and no one will remember you existed. I hope you find a more constructive and amicable way to post when your ban expires. [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#B22222">Chekhov</font> <font color="#2F4F4F">MacGuffin</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#696969">talk</font>''']]</sup> 20:08, 28 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Forgiving == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm sorry, Chekhov. :( --[[User:Arrimasarrington1992|Arrimasarrington1992]] ([[User talk:Arrimasarrington1992|talk]]) 03:42, 24 October 2016 (CEST) |
Revision as of 01:42, 24 October 2016
My page has been fixed by someone.
Forum account status
You were banned on the forum on August 11th for thirty days. The reasons are
- Treating other users poorly for no reason. Ordering people around impatiently is extraordinarily rude. Continuing to bother them after they told you to stop being rude is harassment.
- Spamming in old threads and creating new topics to inflate your post count.
- Asking questions you already knew the answer to waste people's time and increase your post count.
- Generally being an attention whore.
You'll probably be permanently banned on the forum AND wiki if you go back to your old behavior when your ban expires. In the meantime, you should think about how you can improve your interactions with people. I know you know how wikis work because I can see your edit history. You posted on my userpage to ask JimmyKudoTV a question in order to draw my attention. It is gross that you are so desperate for attention and validation that you are willing to cause trouble to get it. You should know better than to waste your time with that because I'll simply ban you, delete your posts, and it will be like you never made an account on the site in the first place, and no one will remember you existed. I hope you find a more constructive and amicable way to post when your ban expires. Chekhov MacGuffin talk 20:08, 28 August 2016 (CEST)
Forgiving
I'm sorry, Chekhov. :( --Arrimasarrington1992 (talk) 03:42, 24 October 2016 (CEST)