Difference between revisions of "User talk:CarpetCrawler"
From Detective Conan Wiki
(→The 'copy and paste'-problem...: new section) |
m (→The 'copy and paste'-problem...: re;) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*second one is about the 'copy and past'-problem: as i mentioned in my comment, i also dont like copy and paste articles... same to you, i think. on the other hand, the gfdl allows to copy or modify article explicitly. so, for the [http://detectivconan.wikia.com/wiki/Detective_Conan_Wiki detectivconan.wikia] i would prefer the word 'copied' instead of 'stolen', since, at least they linked detectiveconanworld as the source for their articles. maybe its better, to link to the taken article directly... but you can comment or correct their references very easy, i think. ones more again, i really dont like article with only one source.. especially when they are copied by another page, since this isnt very useful, i think. on the other hand, detectiveconanworld also allows others to copy articles from the wikipedia with the information note on the mainpage... the gfdl only says, you have to keep up a history file for an article / document published under this licence and to recognize former authors, i think. | *second one is about the 'copy and past'-problem: as i mentioned in my comment, i also dont like copy and paste articles... same to you, i think. on the other hand, the gfdl allows to copy or modify article explicitly. so, for the [http://detectivconan.wikia.com/wiki/Detective_Conan_Wiki detectivconan.wikia] i would prefer the word 'copied' instead of 'stolen', since, at least they linked detectiveconanworld as the source for their articles. maybe its better, to link to the taken article directly... but you can comment or correct their references very easy, i think. ones more again, i really dont like article with only one source.. especially when they are copied by another page, since this isnt very useful, i think. on the other hand, detectiveconanworld also allows others to copy articles from the wikipedia with the information note on the mainpage... the gfdl only says, you have to keep up a history file for an article / document published under this licence and to recognize former authors, i think. | ||
anyway, thanks for taking your time, reading the german dc-wiki as well. lg.--[[User:Rikku|Rikku]] 00:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | anyway, thanks for taking your time, reading the german dc-wiki as well. lg.--[[User:Rikku|Rikku]] 00:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :good morning. thanks for your message...and take some rest first, please :) it would be much more comfortable, if you answer directly on this page, i think. so we can avoid kind of 'fragmented conversation'. i will check out detectiveconanworld frequently... and when i finished this summers exams, id like to help out also. lg--[[User:Rikku|Rikku]] 12:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:38, 17 July 2010
Welcome to my talkpage! Feel free to leave me a message.
Archives: 1
The 'copy and paste'-problem...
good evening, senpai. thanks again for the warm welcome. also for adding me as you friends.. sorry, i didnt noticed earlier. actually a have two questions concerning your last comment on the discussion section of the german wiki.
- first one is about the slogan 'one truth prevails': as you noticed, i tried to research for some other english wiki, since some of our members mentioned them... my question is about the wiki 'onetrueprevials... the detectiveconanworld wiki didnt fusion with them, didnt you? im a little bit confused, since both of you use the same slogan... maybe this is part of the american 'case closed' publications, no?
- second one is about the 'copy and past'-problem: as i mentioned in my comment, i also dont like copy and paste articles... same to you, i think. on the other hand, the gfdl allows to copy or modify article explicitly. so, for the detectivconan.wikia i would prefer the word 'copied' instead of 'stolen', since, at least they linked detectiveconanworld as the source for their articles. maybe its better, to link to the taken article directly... but you can comment or correct their references very easy, i think. ones more again, i really dont like article with only one source.. especially when they are copied by another page, since this isnt very useful, i think. on the other hand, detectiveconanworld also allows others to copy articles from the wikipedia with the information note on the mainpage... the gfdl only says, you have to keep up a history file for an article / document published under this licence and to recognize former authors, i think.
anyway, thanks for taking your time, reading the german dc-wiki as well. lg.--Rikku 00:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- good morning. thanks for your message...and take some rest first, please :) it would be much more comfortable, if you answer directly on this page, i think. so we can avoid kind of 'fragmented conversation'. i will check out detectiveconanworld frequently... and when i finished this summers exams, id like to help out also. lg--Rikku 12:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
